CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of a previous award. The applicant had sought reconsideration of findings that she sustained industrial injury to her bilateral upper extremities, neck musculature, shoulders, and upper back, but not to her psyche or cervical spine. The Board adopted the WCJ's report and recommendations, denying the petition and noting a potential clerical error in the award regarding medical treatment for the cervical spine and psyche.
MAGDALENA PINEDA vs. INAMED CORPORATION aka MCGHAN MEDICAL, CIGA by CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, SAFECO is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of a previous award. The applicant had sought reconsideration of findings that she sustained industrial injury to her bilateral upper extremities, neck musculature, shoulders, and upper back, but not to her psyche or cervical spine. The Board adopted the WCJ's report and recommendations, denying the petition and noting a potential clerical error in the award regarding medical treatment for the cervical spine and psyche.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.