Home/Case Law/LYNETTE KERMANINEJAD vs. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

LYNETTE KERMANINEJAD vs. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, BROADSPIRE

Filed: May 25, 2012
San Jose
ADJ7605039

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration in the case of Kermaninejad v. Good Samaritan Hospital. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge and incorporated them into their order. Defense counsel was admonished for attempting to introduce new evidence without meeting the required legal standard. Therefore, the Petition for Reconsideration was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration in the case of Kermaninejad v. Good Samaritan Hospital. The Board adopted the findings of the administrative law judge and incorporated them into their order. Defense counsel was admonished for attempting to introduce new evidence without meeting the required legal standard. Therefore, the Petition for Reconsideration was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LYNETTE KERMANINEJAD vs. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, BROADSPIRE (2012) – San Jose | CompFox