CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's award. The applicant argued the judge erred by using the 2005 Schedule instead of the 1997 Schedule for rating permanent disability, but the Board found the judge's reasoning, consistent with appellate precedent, to be correct. The denial affirmed the calculated permanent disability rating based on injuries to the applicant's shoulders.
LULIO ARAUJO vs. THE QUEEN MARY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's award. The applicant argued the judge erred by using the 2005 Schedule instead of the 1997 Schedule for rating permanent disability, but the Board found the judge's reasoning, consistent with appellate precedent, to be correct. The denial affirmed the calculated permanent disability rating based on injuries to the applicant's shoulders.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.