Home/Case Law/ LUIS MEDRANO, vs. SME CONSTRUCTION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

LUIS MEDRANO, vs. SME CONSTRUCTION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,

Filed: Oct 01, 2007
San Francisco
OXN 139919 OXN 139918

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because it was unverified. The defendant argued the applicant was fully compensated and benefits exceeded the statutory limit, but failed to provide a compelling reason for the lack of verification, a requirement under Labor Code section 5902. Therefore, the court found no reason to disturb the original Findings and Award.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because it was unverified. The defendant argued the applicant was fully compensated and benefits exceeded the statutory limit, but failed to provide a compelling reason for the lack of verification, a requirement under Labor Code section 5902. Therefore, the court found no reason to disturb the original Findings and Award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LUIS MEDRANO, vs. SME CONSTRUCTION; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox