Home/Case Law/LUDA BRAGINSKY vs. JOHN MUIR HEALTH
Regular DecisionRemoval Petition

LUDA BRAGINSKY vs. JOHN MUIR HEALTH

Filed: Aug 17, 2018
Oakland
ADJ8769067

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Luda Braginsky's Petition for Removal. The Board found that Braginsky failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result from denial, or that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Removal is an extraordinary remedy reserved for cases with such severe circumstances. Braginsky may still raise the issue with the trial judge.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Luda Braginsky's Petition for Removal. The Board found that Braginsky failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result from denial, or that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Removal is an extraordinary remedy reserved for cases with such severe circumstances. Braginsky may still raise the issue with the trial judge.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LUDA BRAGINSKY vs. JOHN MUIR HEALTH (2018) – Oakland | CompFox