CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Everest's petition for reconsideration, finding that Everest properly filed a timely petition for contribution on August 11, 2006. The Board rescinded the lower orders, determining that not all contribution issues were subject to mandatory arbitration, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board encouraged voluntary arbitration of all contribution issues to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
LUCRETIA SHERMAINE vs. LIFECARE ASSURANCE COMPANY, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ACCA, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Everest's petition for reconsideration, finding that Everest properly filed a timely petition for contribution on August 11, 2006. The Board rescinded the lower orders, determining that not all contribution issues were subject to mandatory arbitration, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board encouraged voluntary arbitration of all contribution issues to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.