CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's decision denying spinal surgery and returned the case for further proceedings, finding the defendant failed to conduct mandatory Utilization Review (UR) after a treating physician recommended surgery. The Board emphasized that per Sandhagen and Cervantes, defendants must follow strict UR and objection timelines for surgical requests. The WCJ was also directed to revisit the applicant's claims for medical mileage and penalties for non-payment of bills, as these issues were improperly deferred. The case will be decided anew by the WCJ, applying current legal standards.
LUCRECIA TEJEDA vs. FELLINI'S RESTAURANT, FARMERS INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's decision denying spinal surgery and returned the case for further proceedings, finding the defendant failed to conduct mandatory Utilization Review (UR) after a treating physician recommended surgery. The Board emphasized that per Sandhagen and Cervantes, defendants must follow strict UR and objection timelines for surgical requests. The WCJ was also directed to revisit the applicant's claims for medical mileage and penalties for non-payment of bills, as these issues were improperly deferred. The case will be decided anew by the WCJ, applying current legal standards.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.