Home/Case Law/LOYD CATLETT vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA c/o CNA CLAIMPLUS
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

LOYD CATLETT vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA c/o CNA CLAIMPLUS

Filed: Apr 21, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ 2674252

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns the calculation of temporary partial disability benefits for a stuntman injured on July 28, 2001, and November 2000. The applicant argued that benefits should be calculated weekly and that later payments should be at the current rate per Labor Code section 4661.5. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding that benefits were properly calculated by comparing total pre-injury average weekly earnings to actual earnings over the entire disability period, reflecting the sporadic nature of the applicant's work. The Board clarified that Labor Code section 4661.5 only applies to temporary total disability, not temporary partial disability.

LOYD CATLETT vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA c/o CNA CLAIMPLUS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns the calculation of temporary partial disability benefits for a stuntman injured on July 28, 2001, and November 2000. The applicant argued that benefits should be calculated weekly and that later payments should be at the current rate per Labor Code section 4661.5. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding that benefits were properly calculated by comparing total pre-injury average weekly earnings to actual earnings over the entire disability period, reflecting the sporadic nature of the applicant's work. The Board clarified that Labor Code section 4661.5 only applies to temporary total disability, not temporary partial disability.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

LOYD CATLETT vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA c/o CNA CLAIMPLUS workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

LOYD CATLETT vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA c/o CNA CLAIMPLUS case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

LOYD CATLETT vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA c/o CNA CLAIMPLUS Case Analysis

LOYD CATLETT vs. ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA c/o CNA CLAIMPLUS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.