CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the initial decision, finding the orthopedic QME's opinions did not constitute substantial evidence. Applicant contended the QME's opinions were inconsistent with medical literature regarding the acceleration of pre-existing conditions. The Board agreed that the QME seemed to conflate causing arthritis with aggravating a pre-existing condition. Therefore, the Board rescinded the original findings and returned the case for further development of the record, specifically regarding the extent of applicant's walking and a clearer medical opinion on causation.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the initial decision, finding the orthopedic QME's opinions did not constitute substantial evidence. Applicant contended the QME's opinions were inconsistent with medical literature regarding the acceleration of pre-existing conditions. The Board agreed that the QME seemed to conflate causing arthritis with aggravating a pre-existing condition. Therefore, the Board rescinded the original findings and returned the case for further development of the record, specifically regarding the extent of applicant's walking and a clearer medical opinion on causation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.