CompFox AI Summary
In Mosqueda v. County of Riverside, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the employer's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury to her coccyx. This finding was based on the substantial medical evidence provided by a Qualified Medical Evaluator whose opinion linked the applicant's prolonged sitting at work to her pain. The Board found the employer's medical evidence insufficient due to a lack of reasoning and explanation.
LOURDES MOSQUEDA vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Mosqueda v. County of Riverside, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the employer's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury to her coccyx. This finding was based on the substantial medical evidence provided by a Qualified Medical Evaluator whose opinion linked the applicant's prolonged sitting at work to her pain. The Board found the employer's medical evidence insufficient due to a lack of reasoning and explanation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.