Home/Case Law/LISA VALDEZ vs. SAINT HELENA HOSPITAL
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

LISA VALDEZ vs. SAINT HELENA HOSPITAL

Filed: Feb 28, 2014
Santa Rosa
ADJ7785936

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a prior order denying a lien claimant's fee, allowing payment for a psychiatric consultation. The Panel Qualified Medical Examiner (PQME) Dr. Burt reasonably requested the consultation with Dr. Goldfield under former AD Rule 32, which permitted PQMEs to obtain necessary consultations. The defendant failed to investigate the potential psychiatric component of the applicant's industrial injury as required by AD Rule 10109, despite being notified by the PQME. Therefore, the Board found that Dr. Goldfield should be compensated for services rendered in the interest of substantial justice.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a prior order denying a lien claimant's fee, allowing payment for a psychiatric consultation. The Panel Qualified Medical Examiner (PQME) Dr. Burt reasonably requested the consultation with Dr. Goldfield under former AD Rule 32, which permitted PQMEs to obtain necessary consultations. The defendant failed to investigate the potential psychiatric component of the applicant's industrial injury as required by AD Rule 10109, despite being notified by the PQME. Therefore, the Board found that Dr. Goldfield should be compensated for services rendered in the interest of substantial justice.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LISA VALDEZ vs. SAINT HELENA HOSPITAL (2014) – Santa Rosa | CompFox