CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to partially reverse the WCJ's decision, affirming the award of Vocational Rehabilitation Maintenance Allowance (VRMA) but rescinding the Labor Code section 5814 penalty on VRMA and attorney's fees under section 5814.5. While the Board agreed VRMA was owed due to changed circumstances, it found the employer's delay was not unreasonable, thus negating grounds for penalties or additional fees. The Board also upheld the allowance of the Employment Development Department's lien.
LISA CASAGRANDE vs. COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to partially reverse the WCJ's decision, affirming the award of Vocational Rehabilitation Maintenance Allowance (VRMA) but rescinding the Labor Code section 5814 penalty on VRMA and attorney's fees under section 5814.5. While the Board agreed VRMA was owed due to changed circumstances, it found the employer's delay was not unreasonable, thus negating grounds for penalties or additional fees. The Board also upheld the allowance of the Employment Development Department's lien.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.