CompFox AI Summary
Linda Mae Lilly was convicted of injury to a child and appealed several conditions of her community supervision. She challenged conditions regarding psychological counseling, participation in a battered women's program, and limited visitation with the victim, arguing improper delegation of authority. The appellate court affirmed these conditions, finding them statutorily authorized or reasonable. However, the court sustained Lilly's challenge to a condition requiring her to pay additional court-appointed attorney fees directly to counsel, ruling this was not expressly authorized. The judgment was reformed to remove this unauthorized condition, and the conviction was affirmed as reformed.
Linda Mae Lilly v. State is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Linda Mae Lilly was convicted of injury to a child and appealed several conditions of her community supervision. She challenged conditions regarding psychological counseling, participation in a battered women's program, and limited visitation with the victim, arguing improper delegation of authority. The appellate court affirmed these conditions, finding them statutorily authorized or reasonable. However, the court sustained Lilly's challenge to a condition requiring her to pay additional court-appointed attorney fees directly to counsel, ruling this was not expressly authorized. The judgment was reformed to remove this unauthorized condition, and the conviction was affirmed as reformed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.