Home/Case Law/Levan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionCivil Action - Summary Judgment Motion

Levan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This case addresses retaliatory discharge claims filed by former employees Adam LeVan and Daryl Sims against their employer, referred to as defendant. Both plaintiffs alleged they were terminated for complaining about the defendant's wage policies regarding non-selling activities. LeVan's termination was ostensibly due to an employee discount policy violation, while Sims's termination was for timekeeping and tardiness violations. The court denied the defendant's motions for summary judgment on the Fair Labor Standards Act and common law retaliatory discharge claims for both plaintiffs, finding sufficient evidence to establish genuine issues of material fact regarding causation and pretext. However, LeVan's claim under the Tennessee Public Protection Act was dismissed as he failed to demonstrate his protected activity was the sole reason for his termination.

Levan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case addresses retaliatory discharge claims filed by former employees Adam LeVan and Daryl Sims against their employer, referred to as "defendant." Both plaintiffs alleged they were terminated for complaining about the defendant's wage policies regarding non-selling activities. LeVan's termination was ostensibly due to an employee discount policy violation, while Sims's termination was for timekeeping and tardiness violations. The court denied the defendant's motions for summary judgment on the Fair Labor Standards Act and common law retaliatory discharge claims for both plaintiffs, finding sufficient evidence to establish genuine issues of material fact regarding causation and pretext. However, LeVan's claim under the Tennessee Public Protection Act was dismissed as he failed to demonstrate his protected activity was the sole reason for his termination.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Levan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. workers compensation case in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Levan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. case law summary from District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Levan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. Case Analysis

Levan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.