Home/Case Law/LETICIA ALCALA vs. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

LETICIA ALCALA vs. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Jul 10, 2018
Bakersfield
ADJ10291397

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the WCJ's decision because the applicant's due process rights may have been violated. The WCJ proceeded to trial on only one of six related claims and accepted stipulations regarding temporary disability despite the applicant's objection and assertion that evidence existed to the contrary. The Board determined the record needed further development to ensure all relevant evidence regarding the temporary disability stipulations was considered. Therefore, the case was returned to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the WCJ's decision because the applicant's due process rights may have been violated. The WCJ proceeded to trial on only one of six related claims and accepted stipulations regarding temporary disability despite the applicant's objection and assertion that evidence existed to the contrary. The Board determined the record needed further development to ensure all relevant evidence regarding the temporary disability stipulations was considered. Therefore, the case was returned to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LETICIA ALCALA vs. BOLTHOUSE FARMS, BROADSPIRE (2018) – Bakersfield | CompFox