CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration of the original May 1, 2007 decision as untimely. The Board denied reconsideration of the December 6, 2007 amended decision, finding that the changes made were clerical corrections to TD and PD rates, not substantial judicial modifications. Therefore, the defendant's arguments regarding the timeliness and merits of the amended decision were rejected.
LESLIE CHOW vs. CENTRO MART, INC., SPRINGFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration of the original May 1, 2007 decision as untimely. The Board denied reconsideration of the December 6, 2007 amended decision, finding that the changes made were clerical corrections to TD and PD rates, not substantial judicial modifications. Therefore, the defendant's arguments regarding the timeliness and merits of the amended decision were rejected.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.