CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding it failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning that the defendant's petition did not meet the extraordinary criteria for removal. Additionally, the defendant's attorneys were admonished for violating WCAB rules by attaching unnecessary documents. The WCJ recommended denial due to the petition's silence on prejudice, irreparable harm, and inadequacy of reconsideration.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding it failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning that the defendant's petition did not meet the extraordinary criteria for removal. Additionally, the defendant's attorneys were admonished for violating WCAB rules by attaching unnecessary documents. The WCJ recommended denial due to the petition's silence on prejudice, irreparable harm, and inadequacy of reconsideration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.