CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Lerhone Williams' Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found no lawful grounds to grant reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report which concluded that the medical evidence, including Dr. Sandhu's reports, was credible and substantial. While the Board acknowledged potential inaccuracies in the medical record, they determined they did not materially affect the outcome of the case. The applicant's assertions, including claims of defense counsel misrepresentation, were found to be incorrect or irrelevant to the decided issues.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Lerhone Williams' Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found no lawful grounds to grant reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report which concluded that the medical evidence, including Dr. Sandhu's reports, was credible and substantial. While the Board acknowledged potential inaccuracies in the medical record, they determined they did not materially affect the outcome of the case. The applicant's assertions, including claims of defense counsel misrepresentation, were found to be incorrect or irrelevant to the decided issues.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.