Home/Case Law/LERHONE WILLIAMS vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES; permissibly self-insured, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

LERHONE WILLIAMS vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES; permissibly self-insured, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Filed: Sep 18, 2014
Santa Rosa
ADJ8255413, ADJ8255415, ADJ8684388

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Lerhone Williams' Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found no lawful grounds to grant reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report which concluded that the medical evidence, including Dr. Sandhu's reports, was credible and substantial. While the Board acknowledged potential inaccuracies in the medical record, they determined they did not materially affect the outcome of the case. The applicant's assertions, including claims of defense counsel misrepresentation, were found to be incorrect or irrelevant to the decided issues.

LERHONE WILLIAMS vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES; permissibly self-insured, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Rosa. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Rosa.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Lerhone Williams' Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found no lawful grounds to grant reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report which concluded that the medical evidence, including Dr. Sandhu's reports, was credible and substantial. While the Board acknowledged potential inaccuracies in the medical record, they determined they did not materially affect the outcome of the case. The applicant's assertions, including claims of defense counsel misrepresentation, were found to be incorrect or irrelevant to the decided issues.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

LERHONE WILLIAMS vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES; permissibly self-insured, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC. workers compensation case in Santa Rosa. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

LERHONE WILLIAMS vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES; permissibly self-insured, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC. case law summary from Santa Rosa. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

LERHONE WILLIAMS vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES; permissibly self-insured, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC. Case Analysis

LERHONE WILLIAMS vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES; permissibly self-insured, administered by YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Rosa. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.