Home/Case Law/LEOPOLDO CERVANTES PADILLA vs. MICROSOLUTIONS, CRUM & FORSTER, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

LEOPOLDO CERVANTES PADILLA vs. MICROSOLUTIONS, CRUM & FORSTER, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

Filed: Aug 23, 2019
Los Angeles
ADJ7231114, ADJ9166550

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB found the petition was timely filed, but the issue the applicant sought reconsideration of—the denial of a replacement QME panel—was an interlocutory procedural decision. Such decisions are not final orders and are subject to removal, not reconsideration, unless significant prejudice or irreparable harm is shown, which was not demonstrated here. Therefore, the petition was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB found the petition was timely filed, but the issue the applicant sought reconsideration of—the denial of a replacement QME panel—was an interlocutory procedural decision. Such decisions are not final orders and are subject to removal, not reconsideration, unless significant prejudice or irreparable harm is shown, which was not demonstrated here. Therefore, the petition was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LEOPOLDO CERVANTES PADILLA vs. MICROSOLUTIONS, CRUM & FORSTER, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA (2019) – Los Angeles | CompFox