CompFox AI Summary
Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer in four sentences:
The Appeals Board reversed a Workers' Compensation Judge's decision, finding that the applicant's psychiatric injury was not substantially caused by lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel actions. While the applicant experienced distress from work-related events, including a counseling memo and an email announcing a meeting, the Board determined that the email was not a "personnel action" under Labor Code section 3208.3(h). Therefore, the employer's defense that the injury stemmed solely from such actions failed, making the psychiatric injury compensable. The Board rescinded the prior order and substituted a finding that the injury is compensable and not barred by the personnel action defense.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer in four sentences:
The Appeals Board reversed a Workers' Compensation Judge's decision, finding that the applicant's psychiatric injury was not substantially caused by lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel actions. While the applicant experienced distress from work-related events, including a counseling memo and an email announcing a meeting, the Board determined that the email was not a "personnel action" under Labor Code section 3208.3(h). Therefore, the employer's defense that the injury stemmed solely from such actions failed, making the psychiatric injury compensable. The Board rescinded the prior order and substituted a finding that the injury is compensable and not barred by the personnel action defense.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.