Home/Case Law/LEONARD CAMPOS (deceased) vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

LEONARD CAMPOS (deceased) vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS, INC.

Filed: Nov 26, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ3566017 (SAC 0298120)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a dispute over a lien for medical-legal expenses filed by Dr. Goldfield. The applicant's attorneys seek reconsideration of an award approving a stipulation between the lien claimant and the defendant, arguing it improperly transfers liability for the lien to them. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition, finding the applicant's attorneys are not aggrieved parties because the stipulation only resolved the defendant's liability and did not impose any new obligations on counsel. The Board clarified that Dr. Goldfield's claim against the applicant's counsel for the remaining balance of the lien can still be litigated before the WCJ.

LEONARD CAMPOS (deceased) vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS, INC. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a dispute over a lien for medical-legal expenses filed by Dr. Goldfield. The applicant's attorneys seek reconsideration of an award approving a stipulation between the lien claimant and the defendant, arguing it improperly transfers liability for the lien to them. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition, finding the applicant's attorneys are not aggrieved parties because the stipulation only resolved the defendant's liability and did not impose any new obligations on counsel. The Board clarified that Dr. Goldfield's claim against the applicant's counsel for the remaining balance of the lien can still be litigated before the WCJ.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

LEONARD CAMPOS (deceased) vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS, INC. workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

LEONARD CAMPOS (deceased) vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS, INC. case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

LEONARD CAMPOS (deceased) vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS, INC. Case Analysis

LEONARD CAMPOS (deceased) vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS, INC. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.