Home/Case Law/LEON REINGOLD vs. LARG ENTERPRISES dba HIGH STAR AUTO CENTER, AMTRUST
Regular DecisionReconsideration

LEON REINGOLD vs. LARG ENTERPRISES dba HIGH STAR AUTO CENTER, AMTRUST

Filed: Dec 04, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ9686274

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration in the case of Leon Reingold v. LARG ENTERPRISES. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who determined that the applicant did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The ALJ's decision was based on significant credibility issues with the applicant's testimony and inconsistent medical history provided. The loss of surveillance video evidence, which was under the applicant's control, further supported the denial.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration in the case of Leon Reingold v. LARG ENTERPRISES. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who determined that the applicant did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The ALJ's decision was based on significant credibility issues with the applicant's testimony and inconsistent medical history provided. The loss of surveillance video evidence, which was under the applicant's control, further supported the denial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LEON REINGOLD vs. LARG ENTERPRISES dba HIGH STAR AUTO CENTER, AMTRUST (2019) – Van Nuys | CompFox