CompFox AI Summary
Dana LeBlanc sued Lamar State College-Orange and her supervisor, Barbara Peveto, alleging disability-based employment discrimination and a hostile work environment due to her Friedreich’s ataxia. LeBlanc contended that she was denied new positions as a laboratory technician and manager after her part-time role was restructured. The defendants sought summary judgment, arguing LeBlanc was not qualified for the new roles and that the alleged harassment was not sufficiently pervasive. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that LeBlanc failed to present a material issue of fact regarding her qualifications for the positions or the severity of the alleged harassment.
LeBlanc v. Lamar State College is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Dana LeBlanc sued Lamar State College-Orange and her supervisor, Barbara Peveto, alleging disability-based employment discrimination and a hostile work environment due to her Friedreich’s ataxia. LeBlanc contended that she was denied new positions as a laboratory technician and manager after her part-time role was restructured. The defendants sought summary judgment, arguing LeBlanc was not qualified for the new roles and that the alleged harassment was not sufficiently pervasive. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that LeBlanc failed to present a material issue of fact regarding her qualifications for the positions or the severity of the alleged harassment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.