CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought removal to rescind an order continuing the case for trial, arguing prejudicial error in not allowing further discovery on non-orthopedic claims. The Appeals Board denied the petition because removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ explicitly reserved the issue of good cause for further discovery to the trial judge, making reconsideration an adequate remedy. Therefore, the petition for removal was denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought removal to rescind an order continuing the case for trial, arguing prejudicial error in not allowing further discovery on non-orthopedic claims. The Appeals Board denied the petition because removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ explicitly reserved the issue of good cause for further discovery to the trial judge, making reconsideration an adequate remedy. Therefore, the petition for removal was denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.