CompFox AI Summary
In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision, the Appeals Board reversed the finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury related to diabetes. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which favored Dr. Nishimura's medical opinion over Dr. Nacouzi's regarding the diabetes. While the award for temporary and permanent disability remains, the applicant is no longer entitled to industrial medical treatment for her diabetes. The decision otherwise affirmed the original award for injuries to the neck, low back, psyche, and irritable bowel syndrome.
Laurie Shreffler vs. Electronic Data System, Hewlett Packard, Travelers Insurance Company is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision, the Appeals Board reversed the finding that the applicant sustained an industrial injury related to diabetes. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which favored Dr. Nishimura's medical opinion over Dr. Nacouzi's regarding the diabetes. While the award for temporary and permanent disability remains, the applicant is no longer entitled to industrial medical treatment for her diabetes. The decision otherwise affirmed the original award for injuries to the neck, low back, psyche, and irritable bowel syndrome.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.