Home/Case Law/KIMBERLY STOKES vs. PATTON STATE HOSPITAL / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH / STATE OF CALIFORNIA, legally uninsured, administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

KIMBERLY STOKES vs. PATTON STATE HOSPITAL / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH / STATE OF CALIFORNIA, legally uninsured, administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jun 28, 2006
SBR 0311485

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns the lien claim of Ambulatory Surgery Center of Pomona (ASCP) for services rendered to an injured worker. The prior decision disallowed the lien because ASCP lacked a fictitious-name permit from the Medical Board of California. ASCP argues a permit wasn't required for facility fees and it possessed necessary accreditations. The Appeals Board rescinded the decision, remanding for a determination of whether ASCP operated as a clinic requiring a permit or an outpatient setting exempt from such if accredited, and whether its accreditation was valid for ASCP.

KIMBERLY STOKES vs. PATTON STATE HOSPITAL / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH / STATE OF CALIFORNIA, legally uninsured, administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns the lien claim of Ambulatory Surgery Center of Pomona (ASCP) for services rendered to an injured worker. The prior decision disallowed the lien because ASCP lacked a fictitious-name permit from the Medical Board of California. ASCP argues a permit wasn't required for "facility fees" and it possessed necessary accreditations. The Appeals Board rescinded the decision, remanding for a determination of whether ASCP operated as a "clinic" requiring a permit or an "outpatient setting" exempt from such if accredited, and whether its accreditation was valid for ASCP.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

KIMBERLY STOKES vs. PATTON STATE HOSPITAL / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH / STATE OF CALIFORNIA, legally uninsured, administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

KIMBERLY STOKES vs. PATTON STATE HOSPITAL / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH / STATE OF CALIFORNIA, legally uninsured, administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

KIMBERLY STOKES vs. PATTON STATE HOSPITAL / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH / STATE OF CALIFORNIA, legally uninsured, administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

KIMBERLY STOKES vs. PATTON STATE HOSPITAL / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH / STATE OF CALIFORNIA, legally uninsured, administered by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.