CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns the validity of a utilization review (UR) and subsequent Independent Medical Review (IMR) denial by defendants. The WCJ found the UR invalid for procedural defects, specifically improper service on the applicant's counsel. Defendants sought reconsideration, arguing the WCJ erred by deeming the UR invalid based on service rules and by issuing a vague award. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's reasoning and affirming the decision, while correcting a typographical error in the award.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns the validity of a utilization review (UR) and subsequent Independent Medical Review (IMR) denial by defendants. The WCJ found the UR invalid for procedural defects, specifically improper service on the applicant's counsel. Defendants sought reconsideration, arguing the WCJ erred by deeming the UR invalid based on service rules and by issuing a vague award. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's reasoning and affirming the decision, while correcting a typographical error in the award.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.