Home/Case Law/KIMBERLEE ZEIGLER-BAINBRIDGE vs. MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, ESIS, INC.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

KIMBERLEE ZEIGLER-BAINBRIDGE vs. MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, ESIS, INC.

Filed: Jun 03, 2019
Redding
ADJ11265619

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, rescinding the previous decision that barred her claim under the "going and coming rule." The Board found that the initial hearing and decision did not adequately develop evidence regarding other potential exceptions to the rule, particularly those related to the employer's requirement for the employee to furnish transportation. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to fully explore these exceptions and ensure due process for the applicant.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, rescinding the previous decision that barred her claim under the "going and coming rule." The Board found that the initial hearing and decision did not adequately develop evidence regarding other potential exceptions to the rule, particularly those related to the employer's requirement for the employee to furnish transportation. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to fully explore these exceptions and ensure due process for the applicant.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

KIMBERLEE ZEIGLER-BAINBRIDGE vs. MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, ESIS, INC. (2019) – Redding | CompFox