Home/Case Law/KIM VUKCEVICH vs. SAFEWAY, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, ACE INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

KIM VUKCEVICH vs. SAFEWAY, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, ACE INSURANCE

Filed: Dec 09, 2009
GRADE

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board reverses the WCJ’s decision that Whole Foods must reimburse Safeway for benefits paid to the applicant. The Board finds that Safeway failed to prove a second cumulative trauma injury by substantial medical evidence.

KIM VUKCEVICH vs. SAFEWAY, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, ACE INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board reverses the WCJ’s decision that Whole Foods must reimburse Safeway for benefits paid to the applicant. The Board finds that Safeway failed to prove a second cumulative trauma injury by substantial medical evidence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

KIM VUKCEVICH vs. SAFEWAY, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, ACE INSURANCE workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

KIM VUKCEVICH vs. SAFEWAY, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, ACE INSURANCE case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

KIM VUKCEVICH vs. SAFEWAY, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, ACE INSURANCE Case Analysis

KIM VUKCEVICH vs. SAFEWAY, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, ACE INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.