Home/Case Law/Kevin Perry vs. Asset Protection and Security Services L.P., Insurance Company of the State of PA
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Kevin Perry vs. Asset Protection and Security Services L.P., Insurance Company of the State of PA

Filed: Apr 01, 2025
San Diego
ADJ18890787; ADJ10622598; ADJ10936287; ADJ11180688

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, Kevin Perry, sought reconsideration of a prior Order Dismissing Case with Prejudice, which was based on the doctrine of res judicata. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) acknowledged that the petition was timely filed within the 60-day statutory period. However, due to the absence of a complete evidentiary record from the lower tribunal, the WCAB was unable to adequately review the applicant's contentions. Consequently, the Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed as premature, and the matter was returned to the Presiding Workers' Compensation Judge (PWCJ) with a recommendation to treat the original petition as one to set aside the initial Order Dismissing, allowing for further proceedings and a new decision that can then be subject to reconsideration.

Kevin Perry vs. Asset Protection and Security Services L.P., Insurance Company of the State of PA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, Kevin Perry, sought reconsideration of a prior Order Dismissing Case with Prejudice, which was based on the doctrine of res judicata. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) acknowledged that the petition was timely filed within the 60-day statutory period. However, due to the absence of a complete evidentiary record from the lower tribunal, the WCAB was unable to adequately review the applicant's contentions. Consequently, the Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed as premature, and the matter was returned to the Presiding Workers' Compensation Judge (PWCJ) with a recommendation to treat the original petition as one to set aside the initial Order Dismissing, allowing for further proceedings and a new decision that can then be subject to reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Kevin Perry vs. Asset Protection and Security Services L.P., Insurance Company of the State of PA workers compensation case in San Diego. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Kevin Perry vs. Asset Protection and Security Services L.P., Insurance Company of the State of PA case law summary from San Diego. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Kevin Perry vs. Asset Protection and Security Services L.P., Insurance Company of the State of PA Case Analysis

Kevin Perry vs. Asset Protection and Security Services L.P., Insurance Company of the State of PA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Diego. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.