Home/Case Law/KEVIN JANNELLE vs. FREEMAN MOTORS, ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, MACERICH COMPANY, CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

KEVIN JANNELLE vs. FREEMAN MOTORS, ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, MACERICH COMPANY, CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION

Filed: Oct 01, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3106373 (SRO 0136132) ADJ3762980 (SRO 0129707) ADJ642079 (SRO 094945) ADJ3252691 (SRO 094944) ADJ3202994 (SRO 090481)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior ruling that denied Travelers' petition for contribution and/or reimbursement. The Board found that Travelers timely instituted proceedings for contribution by filing a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed on January 16, 2009, within one year of the applicant's settlement approval. The case is remanded for arbitration of Travelers' claims and to address SCIF's statute of limitations defense.

KEVIN JANNELLE vs. FREEMAN MOTORS, ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, MACERICH COMPANY, CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior ruling that denied Travelers' petition for contribution and/or reimbursement. The Board found that Travelers timely "instituted proceedings" for contribution by filing a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed on January 16, 2009, within one year of the applicant's settlement approval. The case is remanded for arbitration of Travelers' claims and to address SCIF's statute of limitations defense.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

KEVIN JANNELLE vs. FREEMAN MOTORS, ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, MACERICH COMPANY, CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

KEVIN JANNELLE vs. FREEMAN MOTORS, ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, MACERICH COMPANY, CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

KEVIN JANNELLE vs. FREEMAN MOTORS, ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, MACERICH COMPANY, CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION Case Analysis

KEVIN JANNELLE vs. FREEMAN MOTORS, ST. PAUL/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DAN MOTTAZ VIDEO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, MACERICH COMPANY, CHUBB SERVICES CORPORATION is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.