Home/Case Law/Kenny Smith vs. MODERN BUILDING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Kenny Smith vs. MODERN BUILDING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Aug 24, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ2506855 (RDG 0044877) ADJ1687185 (RDG 0032808)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves successive spinal injuries to Kenny Smith. CIGA seeks relief as administrator for the 1990 injury, arguing it's not a covered claim as SCIF provides other insurance. The Appeals Board granted CIGA's petition, finding SCIF is indeed other available insurance for the same injury. SCIF is appointed administrator and is entitled to a $14,667.67 credit against its liability, stemming from the applicant's prior third-party recovery for the 1986 injury.

Kenny Smith vs. MODERN BUILDING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves successive spinal injuries to Kenny Smith. CIGA seeks relief as administrator for the 1990 injury, arguing it's not a covered claim as SCIF provides "other insurance." The Appeals Board granted CIGA's petition, finding SCIF is indeed other available insurance for the same injury. SCIF is appointed administrator and is entitled to a $14,667.67 credit against its liability, stemming from the applicant's prior third-party recovery for the 1986 injury.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Kenny Smith vs. MODERN BUILDING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Kenny Smith vs. MODERN BUILDING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Kenny Smith vs. MODERN BUILDING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE Case Analysis

Kenny Smith vs. MODERN BUILDING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.