CompFox AI Summary
Kenneth Montgomery sued his employer, Valerus Compression Services, L.P., alleging wrongful termination in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim. The trial court granted Valerus’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Montgomery contended he presented sufficient evidence on all elements of retaliation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, concluding that Montgomery failed to raise a fact issue on whether Valerus failed to uniformly apply its absence policy. Therefore, the summary judgment on his retaliation claim was deemed proper.
Kenneth Montgomery v. Valerus Compression Services, LP is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Kenneth Montgomery sued his employer, Valerus Compression Services, L.P., alleging wrongful termination in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim. The trial court granted Valerus’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Montgomery contended he presented sufficient evidence on all elements of retaliation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, concluding that Montgomery failed to raise a fact issue on whether Valerus failed to uniformly apply its absence policy. Therefore, the summary judgment on his retaliation claim was deemed proper.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.