Home/Case Law/Kenneth Hazelbaker vs. California Highway Patrol, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Kenneth Hazelbaker vs. California Highway Patrol, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Oct 05, 2020
Riverside
ADJ11415215

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding a prior award for applicant Kenneth Hazelbaker's industrial prostate cancer. The Board affirmed the finding that the cancer is presumed compensable under Labor Code section 3212.1, as medical evidence supported its development within the statutory period. The WCJ's reservation of jurisdiction was also upheld, as prostate cancer was correctly deemed an insidious and progressive disease. Finally, the Board confirmed the applicant's entitlement to permanent disability indemnity based on maximum earnings under Labor Code section 4458.5.

Kenneth Hazelbaker vs. California Highway Patrol, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding a prior award for applicant Kenneth Hazelbaker's industrial prostate cancer. The Board affirmed the finding that the cancer is presumed compensable under Labor Code section 3212.1, as medical evidence supported its development within the statutory period. The WCJ's reservation of jurisdiction was also upheld, as prostate cancer was correctly deemed an insidious and progressive disease. Finally, the Board confirmed the applicant's entitlement to permanent disability indemnity based on maximum earnings under Labor Code section 4458.5.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Kenneth Hazelbaker vs. California Highway Patrol, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Riverside. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Kenneth Hazelbaker vs. California Highway Patrol, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Riverside. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Kenneth Hazelbaker vs. California Highway Patrol, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

Kenneth Hazelbaker vs. California Highway Patrol, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Riverside. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.