CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Removal as moot because the case was rescheduled for a mandatory settlement conference after the judge rescinded a trial setting. The Board also denied the lien claimant's Petition for Removal, finding the defendant had not waived its objection under Labor Code section 4903.5(c) and that the lien claimant failed to show irreparable harm. The Board reiterated that removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.
KENNETH HASKILL vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Removal as moot because the case was rescheduled for a mandatory settlement conference after the judge rescinded a trial setting. The Board also denied the lien claimant's Petition for Removal, finding the defendant had not waived its objection under Labor Code section 4903.5(c) and that the lien claimant failed to show irreparable harm. The Board reiterated that removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.