CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed AC Transit's petition for reconsideration of a stipulation and award due to a calculation error regarding permanent disability advances. The Board found that no evidence or testimony had been presented under oath to support AC Transit's claim of mutual mistake or the applicant's argument of unilateral mistake. Therefore, the matter was premature for reconsideration, and the case was returned to the Workers' Compensation Judge to schedule a hearing for evidence to be presented.
Kenneth Farias vs. AC TRANSIT, Administered by YORK RISK SERVICE GROUP is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed AC Transit's petition for reconsideration of a stipulation and award due to a calculation error regarding permanent disability advances. The Board found that no evidence or testimony had been presented under oath to support AC Transit's claim of mutual mistake or the applicant's argument of unilateral mistake. Therefore, the matter was premature for reconsideration, and the case was returned to the Workers' Compensation Judge to schedule a hearing for evidence to be presented.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.