CompFox AI Summary
This case involves Kelyn Hogue's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation finding that he did not sustain a back injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The applicant claimed he reported the injury and sought treatment, but lacked corroborating evidence, and his credibility was questioned by both the WCJ and the QME. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, deferring to the WCJ's credibility determination and the applicant's failure to meet his burden of proof.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves Kelyn Hogue's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation finding that he did not sustain a back injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The applicant claimed he reported the injury and sought treatment, but lacked corroborating evidence, and his credibility was questioned by both the WCJ and the QME. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, deferring to the WCJ's credibility determination and the applicant's failure to meet his burden of proof.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.