Home/Case Law/KELLY STINNETT vs. LOS ANGELES DODGERS, NEW YORK METS, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, KANSAS CITY ROYALS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CINCINNATI REDS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

KELLY STINNETT vs. LOS ANGELES DODGERS, NEW YORK METS, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, KANSAS CITY ROYALS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CINCINNATI REDS

Filed: Jul 31, 2015
Anaheim
ADJ8499686

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a professional baseball player's workers' compensation claim against multiple employers and their insurers, including the Los Angeles Dodgers. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the insurer's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding of industrial injury and a 15% permanent disability bump up due to the employer's non-compliance with return-to-work requirements. The WCAB found sufficient connection to California jurisdiction as the applicant was employed by the Los Angeles Dodgers, a California-based team, during the cumulative trauma period. The WCAB also affirmed the application of Labor Code section 4658(d)(2), finding no exception for professional athletes.

KELLY STINNETT vs. LOS ANGELES DODGERS, NEW YORK METS, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, KANSAS CITY ROYALS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CINCINNATI REDS is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a professional baseball player's workers' compensation claim against multiple employers and their insurers, including the Los Angeles Dodgers. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the insurer's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding of industrial injury and a 15% permanent disability "bump up" due to the employer's non-compliance with return-to-work requirements. The WCAB found sufficient connection to California jurisdiction as the applicant was employed by the Los Angeles Dodgers, a California-based team, during the cumulative trauma period. The WCAB also affirmed the application of Labor Code section 4658(d)(2), finding no exception for professional athletes.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

KELLY STINNETT vs. LOS ANGELES DODGERS, NEW YORK METS, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, KANSAS CITY ROYALS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CINCINNATI REDS workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

KELLY STINNETT vs. LOS ANGELES DODGERS, NEW YORK METS, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, KANSAS CITY ROYALS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CINCINNATI REDS case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

KELLY STINNETT vs. LOS ANGELES DODGERS, NEW YORK METS, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, KANSAS CITY ROYALS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CINCINNATI REDS Case Analysis

KELLY STINNETT vs. LOS ANGELES DODGERS, NEW YORK METS, ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS, KANSAS CITY ROYALS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CINCINNATI REDS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.