Home/Case Law/KEITH SCHKODA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA/DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS, Legally Uninsured
Regular DecisionReconsideration

KEITH SCHKODA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA/DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS, Legally Uninsured

Filed: Feb 26, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ2936583 (VNO 0386402) ADJ1823404 (VNO 0386401)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's prior decision, and returned the case for further proceedings. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which recommended reconsideration of issues including the combination of injuries, separate findings of fact and law, apportionment, and attorney fees for prior counsel. The matter is remanded for the WCJ to reconsider the medical and testimonial record.

KEITH SCHKODA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA/DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS, Legally Uninsured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's prior decision, and returned the case for further proceedings. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which recommended reconsideration of issues including the combination of injuries, separate findings of fact and law, apportionment, and attorney fees for prior counsel. The matter is remanded for the WCJ to reconsider the medical and testimonial record.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

KEITH SCHKODA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA/DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS, Legally Uninsured workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

KEITH SCHKODA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA/DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS, Legally Uninsured case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

KEITH SCHKODA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA/DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS, Legally Uninsured Case Analysis

KEITH SCHKODA vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA/DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACTS, Legally Uninsured is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.