Home/Case Law/Keisling v. Keisling
Regular Panel Decision DecisionPost-Divorce Child Custody Modification Appeal

Keisling v. Keisling

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a second appeal in a protracted post-divorce child custody dispute. The Mother and maternal Grandparents repeatedly accused the Father of sexual abuse against the children, leading to numerous medical and psychological examinations, all of which found the allegations unsubstantiated. The trial court ultimately changed custody from the Mother to the Father, citing the Mother's and Grandparents' persistent false accusations, their animosity towards the Father, and the resulting harm to the children's well-being and their relationship with their Father. The Grandparents' petition for visitation was dismissed as moot because they would have unrestricted access during the Mother's visitation. The appellate court affirmed the change in custody and the dismissal of grandparent visitation but vacated and remanded the decision regarding the Guardian Ad Litem's (GAL) fees, instructing the trial court to reconsider the fee amount based on appropriate legal standards and the GAL's role.

Keisling v. Keisling is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a second appeal in a protracted post-divorce child custody dispute. The Mother and maternal Grandparents repeatedly accused the Father of sexual abuse against the children, leading to numerous medical and psychological examinations, all of which found the allegations unsubstantiated. The trial court ultimately changed custody from the Mother to the Father, citing the Mother's and Grandparents' persistent false accusations, their animosity towards the Father, and the resulting harm to the children's well-being and their relationship with their Father. The Grandparents' petition for visitation was dismissed as moot because they would have unrestricted access during the Mother's visitation. The appellate court affirmed the change in custody and the dismissal of grandparent visitation but vacated and remanded the decision regarding the Guardian Ad Litem's (GAL) fees, instructing the trial court to reconsider the fee amount based on appropriate legal standards and the GAL's role.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Keisling v. Keisling workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Keisling v. Keisling case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Keisling v. Keisling Case Analysis

Keisling v. Keisling is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.