Home/Case Law/KATHY MCFALL vs. CITY OF TRACY; ACCLAMATION FRESNO
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

KATHY MCFALL vs. CITY OF TRACY; ACCLAMATION FRESNO

Filed: Sep 21, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3802070 (OAK 0299591)

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB denied the defendant's petition for removal, which sought to rescind a WCJ's order denying dismissal. The WCJ had correctly noted that the defendant vitiated its dismissal petition by concurrently filing a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed, thus reactivating the case. Although the defendant's petition was dismissed without prejudice, the Board clarified that filing a DOR does not prevent a case from being dismissed if inactive for over a year. The case is now scheduled for a mandatory settlement conference where the dismissal issue can be addressed on its merits.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB denied the defendant's petition for removal, which sought to rescind a WCJ's order denying dismissal. The WCJ had correctly noted that the defendant vitiated its dismissal petition by concurrently filing a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed, thus reactivating the case. Although the defendant's petition was dismissed without prejudice, the Board clarified that filing a DOR does not prevent a case from being dismissed if inactive for over a year. The case is now scheduled for a mandatory settlement conference where the dismissal issue can be addressed on its merits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

KATHY MCFALL vs. CITY OF TRACY; ACCLAMATION FRESNO (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox