CompFox AI Summary
This case involved a $$50$ sanction imposed on applicant's attorney for repeatedly failing to punch holes in documents submitted to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, a violation of Rule 10392. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the attorney's claim of inadvertence unconvincing given repeated warnings and the resulting delays. The Board emphasized that non-compliance with filing rules can indeed lead to sanctions under Labor Code § 5813.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involved a $$50$ sanction imposed on applicant's attorney for repeatedly failing to punch holes in documents submitted to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, a violation of Rule 10392. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the attorney's claim of inadvertence unconvincing given repeated warnings and the resulting delays. The Board emphasized that non-compliance with filing rules can indeed lead to sanctions under Labor Code § 5813.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.