Home/Case Law/KATHLEEN HOMM vs. TEACHING LIVING CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

KATHLEEN HOMM vs. TEACHING LIVING CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Mar 01, 2017
Santa Rosa
ADJ8371308

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an employer and their insurance carrier's petition for removal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The Board denied the petition, finding that the employer failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was not granted. Furthermore, the Board concluded that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if an adverse decision ultimately issues. The employer's contentions can still be raised with the trial judge.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an employer and their insurance carrier's petition for removal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The Board denied the petition, finding that the employer failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was not granted. Furthermore, the Board concluded that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if an adverse decision ultimately issues. The employer's contentions can still be raised with the trial judge.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

KATHLEEN HOMM vs. TEACHING LIVING CONCEPTS, CYPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY (2017) – Santa Rosa | CompFox