Home/Case Law/JULIA PLEASANT vs. PACIFIC ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JULIA PLEASANT vs. PACIFIC ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION

Filed: Aug 14, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ7452091

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Pacific Alliance Medical Center's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ), who found the applicant credible and her injuries supported by substantial medical evidence. The WCJ determined the applicant's psychiatric injury stemmed from cumulative trauma, not personnel actions. The defendants failed to present sufficient contrary evidence to overturn the original findings and award.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Pacific Alliance Medical Center's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ), who found the applicant credible and her injuries supported by substantial medical evidence. The WCJ determined the applicant's psychiatric injury stemmed from cumulative trauma, not personnel actions. The defendants failed to present sufficient contrary evidence to overturn the original findings and award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JULIA PLEASANT vs. PACIFIC ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION (2013) – San Francisco | CompFox