Home/Case Law/JUDITH KRAFT vs. CORREY JAMESTOWN, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC., BROADSPIRE CONCORD
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

JUDITH KRAFT vs. CORREY JAMESTOWN, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC., BROADSPIRE CONCORD

Filed: Jan 27, 2017
San Francisco
ADJ3957329 (OAK 0162600) ADJ621097 (OAK 0183630)

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary for a lawyer in maximum four sentences: Hartford Insurance sought removal of an order requiring it to administer the applicant's future medical award for all body parts. Hartford argued this would cause irreparable harm by potentially barring reimbursement from CIGA for neck injury treatment, for which Hartford claims no current liability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied removal, adopting the judge's reasoning that potential prejudice to Hartford was outweighed by applicant's need for a single administrator and the judge's discretion to assign administration pending adjudication of neck injury liability. Commissioner Lowe dissented, arguing Hartford faces substantial prejudice and potential liability for an injury it did not insure.

JUDITH KRAFT vs. CORREY JAMESTOWN, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC., BROADSPIRE CONCORD is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary for a lawyer in maximum four sentences:

Hartford Insurance sought removal of an order requiring it to administer the applicant's future medical award for all body parts. Hartford argued this would cause irreparable harm by potentially barring reimbursement from CIGA for neck injury treatment, for which Hartford claims no current liability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied removal, adopting the judge's reasoning that potential prejudice to Hartford was outweighed by applicant's need for a single administrator and the judge's discretion to assign administration pending adjudication of neck injury liability. Commissioner Lowe dissented, arguing Hartford faces substantial prejudice and potential liability for an injury it did not insure.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JUDITH KRAFT vs. CORREY JAMESTOWN, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC., BROADSPIRE CONCORD workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JUDITH KRAFT vs. CORREY JAMESTOWN, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC., BROADSPIRE CONCORD case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JUDITH KRAFT vs. CORREY JAMESTOWN, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC., BROADSPIRE CONCORD Case Analysis

JUDITH KRAFT vs. CORREY JAMESTOWN, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC., BROADSPIRE CONCORD is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.