CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Basso Pharmacy's petition for reconsideration of an order dismissing its lien claim. The lien claimant argued it should not have been dismissed because its representative communicated with the court and defendant via phone about a scheduling conflict and that a different judge issuing the dismissal order than the one who issued the notice of intent was improper. The Board found the petition lacked specificity, failed to cite legal authority, and did not establish that the phone call constituted a formal appearance. Therefore, the petition was denied as skeletal.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Basso Pharmacy's petition for reconsideration of an order dismissing its lien claim. The lien claimant argued it should not have been dismissed because its representative communicated with the court and defendant via phone about a scheduling conflict and that a different judge issuing the dismissal order than the one who issued the notice of intent was improper. The Board found the petition lacked specificity, failed to cite legal authority, and did not establish that the phone call constituted a formal appearance. Therefore, the petition was denied as skeletal.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.