CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Safeway's petition for reconsideration and removal concerning a finding about a potential surgical consult. The Board found the judge's finding was not a final order subject to reconsideration as it was prospective and contingent. Similarly, it was not an order or decision subject to removal because it did not definitively order any action or decide any rights. Safeway's argument that applicant's trust in a specific doctor was irrelevant was not addressed as the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds.
JUANITA NUNO vs. SAFEWAY, INC., Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Safeway's petition for reconsideration and removal concerning a finding about a potential surgical consult. The Board found the judge's finding was not a final order subject to reconsideration as it was prospective and contingent. Similarly, it was not an order or decision subject to removal because it did not definitively order any action or decide any rights. Safeway's argument that applicant's trust in a specific doctor was irrelevant was not addressed as the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.