Home/Case Law/JUAN RAMOS vs. SCI TEK STAFFING, CHARTIS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JUAN RAMOS vs. SCI TEK STAFFING, CHARTIS

Filed: Apr 08, 2013
Oakland
ADJ7303543

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a workers' compensation claim where the Appeals Board granted reconsideration. The prior WCJ decision was found inconsistent with Enriquez v. Couto Dairy, which established that the Appeals Board can find preemption of Administrative Director (AD) Rule 9789.70, specifically the Official Medical Fee Schedule for air ambulance services. The Board clarified that the Airline Deregulation Act may preempt this rule if the air ambulance provider qualifies as an "air carrier" and has the burden of proving this status. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with Enriquez.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a workers' compensation claim where the Appeals Board granted reconsideration. The prior WCJ decision was found inconsistent with Enriquez v. Couto Dairy, which established that the Appeals Board can find preemption of Administrative Director (AD) Rule 9789.70, specifically the Official Medical Fee Schedule for air ambulance services. The Board clarified that the Airline Deregulation Act may preempt this rule if the air ambulance provider qualifies as an "air carrier" and has the burden of proving this status. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with Enriquez.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JUAN RAMOS vs. SCI TEK STAFFING, CHARTIS (2013) – Oakland | CompFox