CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an award finding the applicant sustained no compensable injury from three claims. The Board admonished applicant's counsel for attaching non-evidentiary documents and citing inadmissible evidence. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, found Agreed Medical Examiners' reports constituted substantial evidence, consistently concluding no further disability or impairment arose from the claimed injuries. Applicant failed to meet the burden of proving compensable injury beyond prior resolved claims.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an award finding the applicant sustained no compensable injury from three claims. The Board admonished applicant's counsel for attaching non-evidentiary documents and citing inadmissible evidence. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, found Agreed Medical Examiners' reports constituted substantial evidence, consistently concluding no further disability or impairment arose from the claimed injuries. Applicant failed to meet the burden of proving compensable injury beyond prior resolved claims.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.