CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award where the applicant sustained industrial injury to both upper extremities with 45% permanent disability after apportionment. Defendant SCIF argued the Administrative Law Judge erred by admitting a physician's report and using the incorrect permanent disability rating schedule, and that new evidence showed withdrawal of that report. Reconsideration was granted to allow further review of the factual and legal issues for a just and reasoned decision.
JOYCE GENHO vs. NEW HORIZON LEARNING CENTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award where the applicant sustained industrial injury to both upper extremities with 45% permanent disability after apportionment. Defendant SCIF argued the Administrative Law Judge erred by admitting a physician's report and using the incorrect permanent disability rating schedule, and that new evidence showed withdrawal of that report. Reconsideration was granted to allow further review of the factual and legal issues for a just and reasoned decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.